ANALYTICAL PERFORMANCE OF PROCALCITONIN LEVEL BETWEEN CHEMILUMINESCENCE AND QUANTITATIVE IMMUNOCHROMATOGRAPHY METHODS IN SEPSIS PATIENTS

Authors

  • Mario Mario Department of Clinical Pathology,Faculty of Medicine, Airlangga University-Dr.Soetomo Hospital Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Betty Agustina Tambunan Department of Clinical Pathology,Faculty of Medicine, Airlangga University-Dr.Soetomo Hospital Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Hardiono Hardiono Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Airlangga University-Dr.Soetomo Hospital Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24293/ijcpml.v25i3.1454

Keywords:

Sepsis, procalcitonin, CLIA, quantitative immunochromatography, diagnostic value

Abstract

Sepsis is a public health problem in many countries. The latest diagnosis criteria are quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment  (qSOFA). Procalcitonin (PCT) could be used to aid the diagnosis of sepsis. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic value of PCT between CLIA and quantitative immunochromatography tests in sepsis patients. Samples were obtained from the resuscitation room, intensive observation room, and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Dr. Soetomo General Hospital between December 2017-February 2018. One hundred and one subjects were examined and classified into sepsis group (n=71) and healthy group (n=30), based on qSOFA and SIRS criteria. Procalcitonin test with CLIA and quantitative immunochromatography method were performed in all subjects, followed by culture examination in sepsis group using PhoenixTM 100. The diagnostic value of the two methods was analyzed by 2x2 table with a Confidence Interval (CI) of 95%. There were significant differences of procalcitonin level between CLIA and quantitative immunochromatography method in the sepsis group (p=0.009) and in the healthy group (p=0.002). The diagnostic value of procalcitonin level by CLIA method with a cut-off value ≥ 0.27 ng/mL (AUC=0.839, sensitivity (Sn)=74.6%, specificity (Sp)=86.7%, Positive Predictive Value (PPV)=93%, Negative Predictive Value (NPV)=59.1%) had the same sensitivity but higher specificity, PPV, and NPV rather than by quantitative immunochromatography method (AUC=0.786, Sn=74.6%, Sp=66.7%, PPV=84.1%, NPV=52.6%). Procalcitonin examination with CLIA had a better diagnostic value than quantitative immuno-chromatography method.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Rahmawati FA, Leksana E. Angka kejadian pneumonia pada sepsis di ICU RSUP Dr. Kariadi Semarang. 2014

Angus DC, Pereira CAP, Silva E. Epidemiology of severe sepsis around the world. Endocrine, Metabolic & Immune Disorders-Drug Targets, 2006;6:7-16.

Jawad I, Luksic I, Rafnsson SB. Assessing available information on the burden of sepsis: global estimates of incidence, prevalence and mortality. Journal of global health. 2012;2(1):65-73.

Bone RC, Sibbald WJ, Sprung CL. The ACCP-SCCP consensus conference on sepsis and organ failure. Chest 1992; 101(6):1481-1483.

Jin M, Khan AI. Procalcitonin: uses in the clinical laboratory for the diagnosis of sepsis. Laboratory Medicine 2010:41(3);173-177.

Assicot M, Gendrel D, Garsin H, et al. High serum procalcitonin concentrations in patients with sepsis and infection. Lancet. 1993;341:515-518

Gendrel D, Bohuon C. Procalcitonin, a marker of bacterial infection. Infection. 1997;25:133-134.

Sakr, Y. et al., 2013. "The influence of gender on the epidemiology of and outcome from severe sepsis". Critical Care 2013, Volume 17, p. R50.

Rumah sakit Dr Soetomo., 2014. "Angka Kejadian Sepsis tahun 2013-2014", Surabaya: Bidang Pemasaran dan Rekam Medik.

Artero, A, Zaragoza, R, Noguiera, JM., 2013. "Epidemiology severe sepsis and shock sepsis", Valencia: Universitat de Valencia.

Nasa P, Juneja D, Singh O. Severe sepsis and septic shock in the elderly: an overview. World JCrit Care Med 2012; 1(1): 23-30.

Stearns-Kurosawa DJ, Osuchowski MF, Valentine C, Kurosawa S, Remick DG. The pathogenesis of sepsis. Annu Rev Pathol. 2011; 6:19-48.

Aird WC. The role of the endothelium in severe sepsis and multiple organ

dysfunction syndrome. Blood 2003 ; 101 : 3765 - 77 .

Lever A, Mackenzie Iain. Sepsis: definition, epidemiology, and diagnosis. BMJ 2007;335:879-883.

De Prost N, Razazi K, Brun-Buisson C. Unrevealing culture-negative severe sepsis. Critical care 2013, 17:1001.

Phua J, Ngerng WJ, See KC, Tay CK, Kiong T, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of culture-negative versus culture positive severe sepsis. Critical care 3013 17:R202.

Schuetz P, Chiappa V, Briel M, Greenwald JL. Procalcitonin algorithms for antibiotic therapy decisions. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(15):1322-1331

Kalem F, Durmaz S, Ozdemir B, Ergun AG, Ertugrul O. The diagnostic value of procalcitonin, WBC, and CRP in diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infection in elderly patients. Biomedical Research 2017; 28(3): 1012-1015.

Vijayan AL, Vanimaya, Ravindran S, Saikant R, Lakshmi, et al. Procalcitonin: a promising diagnostic marker for sepsis and antibiotic therapy. Journal of Intensive Care. 2017;5:51-57.

Downloads

Submitted

2019-01-23

Accepted

2019-04-18

Published

2019-04-18

How to Cite

[1]
Mario, M., Tambunan, B.A. and Hardiono, H. 2019. ANALYTICAL PERFORMANCE OF PROCALCITONIN LEVEL BETWEEN CHEMILUMINESCENCE AND QUANTITATIVE IMMUNOCHROMATOGRAPHY METHODS IN SEPSIS PATIENTS. INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY AND MEDICAL LABORATORY. 25, 3 (Apr. 2019), 297–302. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24293/ijcpml.v25i3.1454.

Issue

Section

Articles