Diagnostic Value of Urinary Dysmorphic Erythrocytes in SLE Patients with Three Different Methods

Authors

  • Ersa Bayung Maulidan Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga/Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya
  • Ferdy Royland Marpaung Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga/Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24293/ijcpml.v28i1.1724

Keywords:

Systemic lupus erythematosus, hematuria, dysmorphic erythrocytes, low condenser light microscope, phase contrast microscope, UF-500i

Abstract

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease with various clinical manifestations. Lupus nephritis is the most common severe manifestation with a poor prognosis. Hematuria is included in the Lupus Activity Criteria Count (LACC) and SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI). Phase Contrast Microscope (PCM) availability as a recommended instrument for dysmorphic erythrocytes evaluation is exclusive, thus causing this examination to be performed rarely. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of dysmorphic erythrocytes in SLE patients with hematuria using Low Condenser Light Microscope (LCLM), PCM, and UF-500i. This research was a cross-sectional study with consecutive sampling; 58 fresh urine samples were examined with UF-500i during May-July 2019. Percentage of dysmorphic erythrocytes were evaluated using LCLM and PCM. Difference percentages of dysmorphic erythrocytes were analyzed using the Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test, degree of agreement by Kappa coefficient, cut-off, sensitivity, and specificity by ROC curve. Dysmorphic erythrocyte percentage in LCLM and PCM showed a significant difference (p < 0.001) and a low degree of agreement (Kappa=0.373). Dysmorphic erythrocyte cut-off with LCLM was 7.5% (sensitivity 70%, specificity 68%) and PCM was 6.5% (sensitivity 74%, specificity 65%). Dysmorphic? flagging from UF-500i showed a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV of 78%, 52%, 58% and 73%, respectively. LCLM can be considered a substitute for PCM for evaluating dysmorphic erythrocytes with its cut-off, so the clinician will be more alert to abnormalities that cause hematuria. Further research with larger samples and definite diagnosis with a kidney biopsy is needed to obtain more accurate results.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Ersa Bayung Maulidan, Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga/Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya

Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga/Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya

Ferdy Royland Marpaung, Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga/Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya

Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga/Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya

References

Fava A, Petri M. Systemic lupus erythematosus: Diagnosis and clinical management. J Autoimmun,

; 96: 1-13.

Hoover PJ, Costenbader KH. Insights into the epidemiology and management of lupus nephritis

from the US rheumatologist's perspective. Kidney Int, 2016; 90(3): 487-92.

Hamadah AM, Gharaibeh K, Mara KC, Thompson KA, Lieske JC, et al. Urinalysis for the diagnosis of

glomerulonephritis: Role of dysmorphic red blood cells. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2018; 33(8): 1397-403.

Touma Z. Proteinuria: Assessment and utility in lupus nephritis. Orthop Res Physiother, 2016; 2(1): 1-8.

Chu-Su Y, Shukuya K, Yokoyama T, Lin W, Chiang C, Lin C. Enhancing the detection of dysmorphic red blood cells and renal tubular epithelial cells with a modified urinalysis protocol. Nat Publ Gr [Internet]. 2017; 1: 1-10. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep40521 (accessed May 5, 2019).

Catarina E, Rita C, Andriyoko B, Parwati I. Proportion of isomorphic Erythrocyte urine in diabetic kidney disease with flow cytometry methods. Indones J Clin Pathol Med Lab, 2018; 25(1): 148-62.

Bottini PV, Andreguetto BD, Krempser K, Lauand JR, Garlipp CR. UriSed as an alternative to phase-contrast microscopy in the differentiation between glomerular and non-glomerular hematuria. Clin Lab, 2015; 61(5-6): 643-6.

Kim H, Kim YO, Kim Y, Suh JS, Cho EJ, Lee HK. Small red blood cell fraction on the UF-1000i urine analyzer as a screening tool to detect dysmorphic red blood cells for diagnosing glomerulonephritis. Ann Lab Med, 2019; 39(3): 277-83.

Cho J, Oh KJ, Jeon BC, Lee SG, Kim JH. Comparison of five automated urine sediment analyzers with manual microscopy for accurate identification of urine sediment. Clin Chem Lab Med, 2019. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31280239/ (accessed July 3, 2019).

Becker GJ, Garigali G, Fogazzi GB. Advances in urine microscopy. Am J Kidney Dis, 2016; 67(6): 954-64.

Downloads

Submitted

2020-10-27

Accepted

2021-02-18

Published

2021-12-15

How to Cite

[1]
Maulidan, E.B. and Marpaung, F.R. 2021. Diagnostic Value of Urinary Dysmorphic Erythrocytes in SLE Patients with Three Different Methods. INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY AND MEDICAL LABORATORY. 28, 1 (Dec. 2021), 41–45. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24293/ijcpml.v28i1.1724.

Issue

Section

Articles