Implementation of Six Sigma in Glucose POCT Quality Control at Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital

Authors

  • Susi Oktaviani Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga/Dr. Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya
  • M. Robiul Fuadi Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga/Dr. Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24293/ijcpml.v28i2.1848

Keywords:

Glucose, six sigma, POCT, IQC, Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital

Abstract

Point of Care Testing (POCT) is important for the examination of critically ill patients in the emergency room and intensive care unit. The evaluation of the analytic quality of POCT is needed to ensure the quality of patient care at Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the analytical quality of POCT at Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital. This was an observational analytical study that was done at Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital Surabaya in July 2017. Point of care testing quality analysis was based on 20 within run Internal Quality Control (IQC). Internal quality control data was used to calculate the mean, SD, and CV%. CV% was calculated with the following equation "CV%=(SD í— 100)/mean". Bias % = [ control mean – control true value]/control true value x 100. The sigma value was obtained from Total Error Allowance (TEa) – Bias/CV. TEa in this study was based on ISO 15197:2003. The results of the glucose examination (58 samples) from Dimension EXL 1, 2, 3 (hexokinase method) compared with 7 glucose POCT (glucose oxidase:i-STAT Nova Biomedical method). The correlation was calculated with Spearman statistical analysis using the SPSS version 23.0. the mean CV of seven POCTs=3.5% (1.7%-5%), mean bias of seven POCT=7.75% (4.8%-12.5%), the mean six sigma of 7 POCT=6.77 (4.0–11.6). The best POCT with a six sigma value of > 6 was glucometer K14_2, Palem 1 and GRIU. The glucometer with the lowest six sigma values but still had good quality control were K14_1 and ROI. All glucometers had a good correlation with r value > 0.8 (p=0.000). Glucose POCT in Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital all had good quality and met world-class standards. Further study using IQC 2 levels is recommended for a better POCT quality evaluation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Susi Oktaviani, Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga/Dr. Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya

Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga/Dr. Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya

M. Robiul Fuadi, Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga/Dr. Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya

Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga/Dr. Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya

References

Widagho. Point of Care Testing (POCT) - Kimia Darah. (2003). http://www.mltunite.com/2013/12/point-of-caretesting-poct-kimia-darah.html. Diunduh pada tanggal 18 Februari 2019.

International Organization for Standardization 2003. Medical laboratories – particular requirements for quality and competence. ISO 15189. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva, Switzerland (2003)

Tonyushkina, K., & Nichols, J. H. Glucose Meters: A Review of Technical Challenges to Obtaining Accurate Results. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, July, 3(4): 971–980 (2009)

Surya Atmadja, M. Pendidikan Berkesinambungan Patologi Klinik 2003. Jakarta: Bagian Patologi Klinik Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia. (2003)

Astuti G. 2012. Analitik Pemeriksaan Glukosa dengan Glukosameter. Dalam : Pemeriksaan Laboratorium pada Diabetes Mellitus, PBPK, Jakarta, Departemen Patologi Klinik, Fak. Kedokteran UI, 2012 ;7-12

Patklin, Panduan Penggunaan Point of Care Testing (POCT) di Rumah Sakit. Jakarta;2 (2012)

Frederick L, Kiechle. Blood Glucose : Measurement in The Point-of-Care-Setting. In : Laboratory Medicine; 31 (5) : 276-7 (2000)

Pasqualetti, S., Braga, F., Panteghini, M. Pre-analytical and analytical aspects affecting clinical reliability of plasma glucose results. Clin. Biochem. 50, 605–611 (2017).

Moodley, N., Ngxamngxa, U., Turzyniecka, M. J. & Pillay, T. S. Historical perspectives in clinical pathology: A history of glucose measurement. J. Clin. Pathol. 68, 258–264 (2015).

Hagvik, J. Glucose measurement: time for a gold standard. J. diabetes Sci. Technol. 1, 169–172 (2007).

Tosuner Z, Gücin Z, Kiran T, Büyükpinarbaşili N, Turna S, Taşkiran O, et al. A Six Sigma trial for reduction of error rates in pathology laboratory. Turk Patoloji Derg ;32:171–7. (2016)

Westgard JO, Westgard SA. Assessing quality on the Sigma scale from proficiency testing and external quality assessment surveys. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:1531–5.

Downloads

Submitted

2021-02-19

Accepted

2022-02-02

Published

2022-06-03

How to Cite

[1]
Oktaviani, S. and Fuadi, M.R. 2022. Implementation of Six Sigma in Glucose POCT Quality Control at Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital. INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY AND MEDICAL LABORATORY. 28, 2 (Jun. 2022), 143–148. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24293/ijcpml.v28i2.1848.

Issue

Section

Articles