Comparison between Sysmex CyFlow Counter and BD FACSCanto II + for counting CD4 Cells in Indonesia

Authors

  • Agus Susanto Kosasih Clinical Pathology Laboratory, Dharmais Cancer Hospital, Jakarta
  • Hubertus Hosti Hayuanta Clinical Pathology Laboratory, Dharmais Cancer Hospital, Jakarta
  • Nasuroh Nasuroh Clinical Pathology Laboratory, Dharmais Cancer Hospital, Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24293/ijcpml.v29i1.1946

Keywords:

HIV, CD4 count, absolute, percentage, CyFlow Counter, FACSCanto II

Abstract

CD4 count is essential in evaluating the immunological status of HIV+ patients and the need for prophylaxis therapy + against opportunistic infections. CyFlow Counter is a novel Sysmex instrument to count CD4 cells and reports the results in + + absolute and percentage values (aCD4 , %CD4 ). However, it has not been evaluated in Indonesia. This study aimed to compare the Sysmex CyFlow Counter with BD FACSCanto II. Samples were collected from leftover EDTA blood samples of + + + patients with CD4 count tested in Dharmais Cancer Hospital. The aCD4 and %CD4 from CyFlow Counter were compared against FACSCanto II using correlation, Bland-Altman, and mean difference test. Sensitivity, specificity, and misclassification rates were also analyzed with aCD4+ count threshold of 200 cells/µL. A total of 70 EDTA blood samples from Dharmais + Cancer Hospital were analyzed with BD FACSCanto II and Sysmex CyFlow Counter, with 20 subjects having CD4 count of 150-299 cells/µL, 28 having 300-449 cells/µL, and 22 having 450-550 cells/µL. CyFlow Counter had a good correlation + + with FACSCanto II in aCD4 and %CD4 (r = 0.892 [p=0.000], r=0.955 [p=0.000], respectively). There was no significant mean + + difference between CyFlow Counter and FACSCanto II (p=0.097 for aCD4 and p=0.611 for %CD4 ). Bland-Altman test + results showed a high agreement (94.29%) with a mean difference of -32.29 cells/µL for aCD4 and a high agreement + (98.57%) with a mean difference of -0.76% for %CD4 . Sensitivity, specificity, and total misclassification rates were 83.33%, + 100.00%, and 3.33%, respectively. Sysmex CyFlow Counter CD4 count results were comparable to FACSCanto II.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Agus Susanto Kosasih, Clinical Pathology Laboratory, Dharmais Cancer Hospital, Jakarta

Clinical Pathology Laboratory, Dharmais Cancer Hospital, Jakarta

Hubertus Hosti Hayuanta, Clinical Pathology Laboratory, Dharmais Cancer Hospital, Jakarta

Clinical Pathology Laboratory, Dharmais Cancer Hospital, Jakarta

Nasuroh Nasuroh, Clinical Pathology Laboratory, Dharmais Cancer Hospital, Jakarta

Clinical Pathology Laboratory, Dharmais Cancer Hospital, Jakarta

References

Ford N, Meintjes G, Vitoria M, Greene G, Chiller T. The evolving role of CD4 cell counts in HIV care. Curr Opin HIV AIDS, 2017; 12(2): 123-128.

Harianah, Renowati E, Triyono EA. Neopterin and CD4+ T-lymphocytes in stage I HIV infection. IJCPML,

; 22(3): 279-83.

World Health Organization. CyFlow Counter with CD4 easy count kit and %CD4 easy count kit [Online]. 2019. Available from: URL:https ://www.who.int/diagnostics_laboratory/evaluations/pq- list/cd4/191016_amended_pqpr_0350_081_00_cyflow_cd4_v2.pdf (accessed Nov 18, 2021).

Scott LE, Kestens L, Pattanapanyasat K, Sukapirom K, Stevens WS. Choosing a new CD4 technology: Can statistical method comparison tools influence the decision?. Cytometry B Clin Cytom, 2017; 92(6): 465-475.

World Health Organization. Guidelines for managing advanced HIV disease and rapid initiation of

antiretroviral therapy [Online]. 2017. Available from: URL:https://apps.who.int/iris/rest/bitstreams/1086609/retrieve (accessed Nov 18, 2021).

Faye B, Mbow M, Seck MC, Mbengue B, Wade D, et al. E v a lua tion of PIMATM CD4 s y s tem for decentralization of immunological monitoring of HIV-infected patients in Senegal. PLoS One, 2016; 11(5): e0154000.

Namuniina A, Lutwama F, Biribawa VM, Kizza D, Kabuubi BR, et al. Field performance of PIMA point-of-care machine for CD4 enumeration under a mobile HIV counseling and testing program in remote

fishing communities of Lake Victoria, Uganda. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses, 2019; 35(4): 382-387.

World Health Organization. WHO protocol for performance–laboratory evaluation of lymphocyte

subsets enumeration technologies [Online]. 2017. Av a i l abl e from:URL :https ://www.who. int/

diagnostics_laboratory/evaluations/alter/171219_protocol_pqdx_114_v6_cd4_technologies.pdf?ua=1

(accessed Nov 18, 2021).

World Health Organization. WHO equalification of in-vitro diagnostics public report: CyFlow Counter

system with CD4 easy count kit and CD4% easy count k i t [ O n l i n e ] . 2 0 2 0 . A v a i l a b l e f r o m :

URL:https://extranet.who.int/pqweb/sites/default/files/1-200430_amended_pqpr_0350_081_00

_cyflow_cd4.pdf (accessed Nov 5, 2022)

Downloads

Submitted

2021-12-15

Accepted

2022-11-01

Published

2023-01-19

How to Cite

[1]
Kosasih, A.S., Hayuanta, H.H. and Nasuroh, N. 2023. Comparison between Sysmex CyFlow Counter and BD FACSCanto II + for counting CD4 Cells in Indonesia. INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY AND MEDICAL LABORATORY. 29, 1 (Jan. 2023), 29–32. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24293/ijcpml.v29i1.1946.

Issue

Section

Articles