Laboratory Aspect of Broken Heart Syndrome

Authors

  • Y. Kusumo Adi Arji Atmanto Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5861-8629
  • Sulina Yanti Wibawa Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University Clinical Pathology Laboratory Installation of Stella Maris Hospital, Makassar
  • Darmawaty E Rauf Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University Clinical Pathology Laboratory Installation of Faisal Hospital, Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24293/ijcpml.v29i2.1990

Keywords:

Broken heart syndrome, catecholamine-induced cardiotoxicity

Abstract

Broken Heart Syndrome (BHS) is the weakness of the heart muscle due to emotional stress or physical stress called cardiomyopathy.  The main etiology is a sudden release of stress hormones (catecholamines), such as norepinephrine, epinephrine, and dopamine. About 90% of BHS patients are female with average age of 67-70"‰ years, most of them are post-menopausal females. The most widely supported pathological theories are catecholamine-induced cardiotoxicity and microvascular dysfunction. The clinical condition resembles that of acute myocardial infarction, consisting of chest pain, electrocardiographic changes, elevated cardiac biomarkers, and abnormalities of heart wall motion. There is transient systolic dysfunction in the apical and/or middle segment of the left ventricle resembling acute myocardial infarction but absence of coronary artery obstructive disease. There are BHS criteria according to Mayo Clinic. Laboratory tests can be performed by examining Natriuretic Peptides, cardio myonecrosis markers (Troponin I and T, creatinine kinase, and myoglobin), and catecholamines. There is no single established biomarker for initial diagnosis of BHS that distinguishes it from STEMI. It was found that the most accurate ratio as a marker capable of differentiating BHS from STEMI in early stages was NTproBNP/TnI ratio. The InterTAK diagnostic score was used to predict the probability of BHS, differentiating it from ACS in an acute stage, prior to coronary angiography. The main differential diagnosis of BHS is ACS, besides acute myocarditis infectious. Patients with BHS should be treated as ACS until proven otherwise. The prognosis for BHS patients is generally very good.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad SA, Brito D, Khalid N, Ibrahim NA. Takotsubo cardiomyopathy. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK430798/ (accessed Aug 7, 2021).

Rathish D, Karalliyadda M. Takotsubo syndrome in patients with myasthenia gravis: A systematic review of previously reported cases. BMC Neurol, 2019; 19(1): 1–9.

Timich EB, Schraga ED. Takotsubo (stress) cardiomyopathy (broken heart syndrome). 2019. Available from: https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1513631/ (accessed Aug 7, 2021).

Peters MN, George P, Irimpen AM. The broken heart syndrome: Takotsubo cardiomyopathy. Trends Cardiovasc Med, 2015; 25(4): 351-7.

Y-Hassan S, Tornvall P. Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and management of Takotsubo syndrome. Clin Auton Res, 2018; 28(1): 53-65.

Khalid N, Ahmad SA, Shlofmitz E, Chhabra L. Pathophysiology of Takotsubo syndrome. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK538160/ (accessed Mar 3, 2021).

Gupta S, Gupta MM. Takotsubo syndrome. Indian Heart J [Internet]. 2018; 70(1):165–74. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2017.09.005 (accessed Mar 3, 2021).

Jabri A, Kalra A, Kumar A, Alameh A, Adroja S, et al. Incidence of stress cardiomyopathy during the Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open, 2020; 3(7): 2–8.

Budnik M, Kochanowski J, Piatkowski R, Wojtera K, Peller M, et al. Simple markers can distinguish Takotsubo cardiomyopathy from ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol [Internet]. 2016; 219: 417–20. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.015 (accessed Mar 3, 2021).

Sattar Y, Siew KSW, Connerney M, Ullah W, Alraies MC. Management of Takotsubo syndrome: A comprehensive review. Cureus, 2020; 12(1): e6556.

Samul-Jastrzebska J, Roik M, Wretowski D, Tabyk A, Slubowska A, et al. Evaluation of the InterTAK diagnostic score in differentiating Takotsubo syndrome from acute coronary syndrome. A single center experience. Cardiol J, 2021; 28(3): 416-422.

Ghadri JR, Wittstein IS, Prasad A, Sharkey S, Dote K, et al. International expert consensus document on Takotsubo syndrome (Part II): Diagnostic workup, outcome, and management. Eur Heart J, 2018; 39(22): 2047-2062.

Gopalakrishnan P, Zaidi R, Sardar MR. Takotsubo cardiomyopathy: Pathophysiology and role of cardiac biomarkers in differential diagnosis. World J Cardiol, 2017; 9(9): 723-730.

Downloads

Submitted

2022-03-22

Accepted

2023-01-27

Published

2023-05-05

How to Cite

[1]
Atmanto, Y.K.A.A., Wibawa, S.Y. and Rauf, D.E. 2023. Laboratory Aspect of Broken Heart Syndrome. INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY AND MEDICAL LABORATORY. 29, 2 (May 2023), 194–199. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24293/ijcpml.v29i2.1990.

Issue

Section

Literature Review