Suitability Analysis of Gram Staining with Blood Culture in Bacteremia

Authors

  • Eva Nada Maulida Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University/Dr. Wahidin Sudirohusodo Hospital, Makassar
  • Irda Handayani Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University/Dr. Wahidin Sudirohusodo Hospital, Makassar
  • Nursin Abdul Kadir Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University/Dr. Wahidin Sudirohusodo Hospital, Makassar/Laboratory of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, Labuang Baji Hospital, Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24293/ijcpml.v30i1.2057

Keywords:

Gram stain, automatic culture, blood, bacteremia

Abstract

Bacteremia is a serious bloodstream infection, requiring blood culture as the gold standard for definitive diagnosis and rational therapy, but it is time-consuming. The Gram stain should be considered as an alternative test, as it is easier and faster to determine empirical antibiotic therapy in order to minimize the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. This study aimed to analyze the suitability of Gram staining results with blood cultures in bacteremia. Cross-sectional study design from August to September 2022 at Dr. Wahidin Sudirohusodo Hospital and Labuan Baji Hospital, Makassar. The study sample used specimens from automatic positive blood culture bottles of new bacteremia patients. Gram staining and sub-culture were performed to determine the type of Gram-positive or negative bacteria. Appropriate statistical analysis was used to compare the two methods. A total of 78 research samples were obtained. The results of subculture vs. Gram staining showed Gram-positive bacteria in 45 vs. 42 samples and Gram-negative bacteria in 33 vs. 36 samples, respectively. A comparative test using the Wilcoxon test showed no significant difference for the 2 tests, p-value = 0.257 (p > 0.05). The results of the Gram diagnostic test on culture showed high sensitivity and specificity, respectively: 88.9%, and 93.9% for Gram-positive bacteria, 93.9% and 88.9% for Gram-negative bacteria. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) were 95.32% and 95.32% for Gram-positive, 86.11%, and 95.23 % for Gram-negative bacteria, respectively. There is a suitability between Gram stain and automatic blood culture results with high diagnostic value. Gram staining is expected to be a guide for selecting empirical therapy based on Gram's classification until the AST test results come out.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Nain J, Deepashree R, Tamang P, Bhat P, Prakash S, et al. Comparison of four different methods of smear preparation for gram staining of positively flagged automated blood culture bottles. Journal of Current Research in Scientific Medicine, 2018; 4(2): 98.

Cattoir L, Coorevits L, Leroux-Roels I, Claeys G, Verhasselt B, Boelens J. Improving timelines in reporting results from positive blood cultures: simulation of impact of rapid identification on therapy on a real-life cohort. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 2018; 37: 2253-60.

Becker FG, Cleary M, Team RM, Holtermann H, The D, et al. Permenkes nomor 8 tahun 2015 tentang Program pengendalian resistensi antimikroba di rumah sakit. PERMENKES, 2015; 7(1): 37–72.

Salimiyan Rizi K, Farsiani H, Momen Ghalibaf M. Blood culture positive for Gram-positive rods: Contamination or a true infection-a literature review. Reviews in Clinical Medicine, 2021; 8: 2.

Rosdiana D, Anggraini D, Balmas M, Effendi D, Bet A. Peningkatan Rasionalitas penggunaan antibiotik pasca implementasi kebijakan penggunaan antimikroba di RSUD Arifin Achmad Pekanbaru. Jurnal Kedokteran Brawijaya, 2018; 36-40.

Barman P, Chopra S, Thukral T. Direct testing by VITEK® 2: A dependable method to reduce turnaround time in Gram-negative bloodstream infections. Journal of Laboratory Physicians, 2018; 10(03): 260-4.

Samuel LP, Blada-Llasat JM, Harrington A, Cavagnolo R. Multicenter assessment of Gram stain error rates. J Clin Microbiol, 2016; 54(6): 1442–7.

Saha M, Sarkar A. Review on multiple facets of drug resistance: a rising challenge in the 21st century. Journal of Xenobiotics, 2021; 11(4): 197-214.

Kim SC, Lee S, Kim S, Cho OH, Park H, Yu SM. Comparison of clinical performance between Bact/Alert Virtuo and Bact/Alert 3rd blood culture systems. Ann Lab Med, 2019; 39(3): 237–42.

Roberts T, Chandna A, Watthanaworawit W, Thaiprakong A, Soeng S, et al. Impact of delayed processing of positive blood cultures on organism detection: A prospective multi-centre study. BMC Infect Dis, 2022; 22(1): 1–8.

Harindana PYA, Iswari IS, Setyojatmiko I, Fatmawati NND. Kesesuaian pewarnaan Gram dengan kultur darah sebagai prediktor nilai kritis kasus bakteremia di Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat Sanglah, Denpasar. Intisari Sains Medis, 2021; 12(2): 494.

Samosir NE, Loesnihari R, Aman AK. Correlation between time to positivity blood culture and procalcitonin on bacteremia patient. Indonesian Journal of Clinical Pathology and Medical Laboratory, 2019; 25(3): 283-289.

Downloads

Submitted

2022-11-14

Accepted

2023-07-04

Published

2023-11-03

How to Cite

[1]
Maulida, E.N., Handayani, I. and Kadir, N.A. 2023. Suitability Analysis of Gram Staining with Blood Culture in Bacteremia. INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY AND MEDICAL LABORATORY. 30, 1 (Nov. 2023), 49–53. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24293/ijcpml.v30i1.2057.

Issue

Section

Articles